Grand Canyon University Web Resources

matthew_member@newsguy.com wrote...

> [...fire and brimstone...]

That's one of the most pathological displays of invective I've ever
seen on Usenet, and after 20 years here that's saying something.

Some of your current comments are simply to restate, with much
greater apparent hostility, comments of yours from weeks ago and
which we'd already gone over. Sample:

You:
> >> >> >> But that was NOT my logic! If you cannot understand
> >> >> >> the difference between my logic and _this_ straw
> >> >> >> man of yours, how can I explain to you how the
> >> >> >> issue of the comma affects our salvation?
You:
> And you still can't understand it, can you? Learn to READ
> 'Entropy'. Make a habit of DOING so before you click 'Send'!

Following up to your own comments, just so you can turn up the heat
on the rhetoric? You've got head problems, boy?

I'm pretty busy this week, but I'll look your garbage over and see if
it warrants a reply. If it does, I'll try to get to it next weekend.

In the meantime, consider Matthew 7. I have. It helped me a lot in
coming to understand a better way of interacting with Usenet's more
obnoxious and overbearing types.

--
Never tire of doing what is right.



((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

gkmcnees@comcast.net wrote:


> Some on this list, and many Theologians have a very hard time relating
> logic with what Scripture says.

That's not what's happening here, however. When I complain about
logic, it's not that I'm "having a tough time relating logic to
Scripture", but because someone is using logic badly when they
deduce from Scripture.

You can't try to use logic and then complain that logic doesn't
apply when your fallacies are unmasked.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

>You also fail to answer the OT witness. Who is, "YHVH and His
>Redeemer, YHVH of hosts?"

scripture please.

>What of Paul's prologue in Ephesians?

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ..." (Eph. 1:3)
"..that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Eph. 1:17) both NASB

What "monologue"? There isn't one.

no trinity in this letter. Jesus Christ has a God- YHWH doe snot have a
God. He is the "only true God" as Jesus himself said (John 17:3). Why
can't you believe Jesus? Shame on you.

>The principal message of the Ephesians undoubtedly provides the
>reason for the concentration of evidence for the doctrine of the
Trinity.

utter bologna writte