One Library Consortium
Features online catalogs for Columbus and Norfolk libraries. Includes a list of obituaries for both cities.
Urban Community Improvement Program
Created in 1991 to support and recognize the contributions of neighborhood associations in Nebraska. Lists city neighborhoods for Scottsbluff, Kearney, Grand Island, Lincoln and Omaha. Also, has resource links.
wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
>> >Bob Felts wrote:
>> >>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>> >>> Bart Goddard writes:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>In the phrases "Scripture alone", "Faith alone", and "Grace alone",
>> >>> >>>"alone" means "only".
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Either undersrtanding of the word 'alone' fails the consistency
>> >>> >> test, since the Scriptures don't teach it!
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Who knows what you mean by "the consistency test"? It's certainly
>> >>> >internally consistant in itself and it's certainly consistence with
>> >>> >Scripture, since the very doctrine "Sola Scriptura" means "You have
>> >>> >to be consistent with Scripture.
>> >>>
>> >>> One cannot be "consistent with Scripture" and teach that Scripture is
>> >>> the sole source of doctrine. The Scriptures themselves refute that
>> >>> notion.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Just curious, but what is your take on 1 Cor 4:6?
>>
>> It certainly does not mean that only the Scriptures are a valid source
>> for doctrine - after all, that would have Paul contradicting himself!
>
>I understand that. I didn't ask what it did not mean, I asked what you
>thought it meant. For example, do you think that it puts limits on how
>far tradition can "wander"?
Scripture already does that - after all, it is the measuring stick.
What we object to is the statement that dogma may *only* be derived
from Scripture. Nothing of what we teach contradicts the Scriptures.
Fundamentally, the Scriptures must be read in context - and that context
is the witness of the church.
>>>Also, a follow up question, if I may:
>>>
>>>What doctrine(s) do you hold which are supported only by tradition?
>>
>>All of them. Tradition is the sum-total of the knowledge of the
>>Church - it includes the Scriptures, the parctices, the exegesis,
>>etc. There is nothing *except* tradition.
>
>So if I were stranded on an island with nothing but the Scriptures, I
>would be totally lost?
That's up to God, not to me. Orthodoxy does not teach that God sends
the non-orthodox to hell. Orthodoxy is the *fullness* of the faith,
but that does not mean that there is not truth elsewhere - though it
may be darker shadows of the truth...
-Stephen
--
Space Age Cybernomad Stephen Adams
malchus842SP@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
gpatton@bayou.com:
> I see no reason to ascribe any value whatsoeve