Grand Canyon University Web Resources

About New Hampshire

General information and links. History, photographs, and trivia. Lists the state motto, tree, bird, flower, wild flower, tree, and insect.

Netstate: New Hampshire

Provides information on state symbols, emblems, geography, famous people, map and news links; plus an almanac and message forum.

Suite 101: New Hampshire

Features weekly articles about the state and includes a message board for discussion.

The New Hampshire Quarter

Information from the US Mint about the state's commemorative quarter.

nnalyd@yahoo.com writes:
>Matthew wrote:
>
>>But there is a book you are forgetting about. And even if you reject
>its
>>canonicity, it would be _highly_ unreasonable for you to ignore its
>witness.
>
>Before we go on. Do all trinitarians accept this book as canonical?
>What Bibles contain it? Are you Catholic?

I'm not Matthew, but the answer is, catholic yes, Roman, no. The
books of the OT that Protestants call "Apocrypha" or "Deuterocanonical"
are accepted by the vast majority of Christians in the world, Roman
Catholic & Orthodox. The books were removed by the radical reformers.

Remember - the Protestant definition of the Scriptures is not the only
one, and it certainly is not the one agrred upon by the majority of
Christians world-wide.

-Stephen
--
Space Age Cybernomad Stephen Adams
malchus842SP@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <150.47.00.05.684757000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...

>Matthew Johnson wrote:

[snip]

>> >> First of all, you miss the point. It proves that it IS possible
>> >> to resist the Holy Spirit. This is enough to disprove the'I' in
>> >> TULIP.

>> >I did not say that it wasn't possible to resist the Spirit.

>> Yes, you did. You have _frequently_ described yourself as believing
>> in all but the 'L' of TULIP. But the 'I' _does_ mean "irresistable
>> grace".

>> Stop equivocating. Or have you finally repented of this error? Are
>> you now a PUT Calvinist instead of PTUI?

>I'm not equivocating.

Yes you are. If you resist grace, you resist the Spirit. But you claim
to believe the I of TULIP, "irresistible grace". Yet now you claim
that is IS possible to resist the Spirit.

Sounds like equivocation to me! Haven't you heard enough of this
equivocation from your kids? Why are you passing it on to us in the
NG?

>Just as, in the natural world, the same phenomena looks different
>when viewed at at different levels, the same thing happens in the
>supernatural world.

Not _that_ different, they don't. You are rationalizing now (instead
of merely equivocating).

>Or consider a play, movie, or book. Suppose an author creates a
>world where people are to do "X". But the author creates a character
>that refuses to do "X". Is this character obeying or resisting the
>author's will?

Unlike Gary, I do not consider the example of an author and his
characters very relevant. And even if I did, I would have to say y