Grand Canyon University Web Resources

But the prophecy might also predict actual rain as well. How do we know
powerful forces whether government,private or some combination thereof
from whatever countries do not suspect or will not suspect the
existence of the 2 witnesses and set about harassing or exploiting them
as possible tools of destruction?

Remember how bad things happened when Ahab sent troops after Elijah?
What if bad events are triggered by the deliberate persecution of the
witnesses and the forces try to harness them as weapons?

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <098.18.18.05.010853000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...

>Loren wrote:
>
>>Hey Matt, why bother? The "rn" for "m" is a scanning error. He's
>>copying this stuff and posting and letting everyone think he's
>writting
>>it
>
>I have cut and pasted stuff here and made the mistake of not specifying
>which was mine and which is borrowed. It is apointless distraction to
>make an ssue out of it.

It is not 'pointless'. If it were, we would not have laws to protect
intellectual property -- laws you habitually disregard.

> But, being that yours and Matthew's arguments
>are so specious I ccan see why you would need distractions.

OURS are specious? HA!

>I will make sure to give each and every source I quote.

So says the man who denied he was doing it the _first_ time Bart and I
pointed out you were quoting without attribution. We wer right not to
believe you then, why wouldn't we be right not to telieve you now?

> But the
>majority of what I've written has been my own words....but really is
>ANYTHING we say not borrowed from somewhere?

Of course not. As Bart already explained, you are imitating the poor
excuses of the student who gave him the nonsense about the alphabet.

> The ante-Nicene material
>IS OBVIOUSLY from a book

A book you failed to name.

> and in atleast two of the similar posts credit
>is given where credit was due.

That is not good enough.

> Perhaps I overestimated your
>intelligence in thinking you would deduce that all posts with "so and
>so Did Not Believe The Trinity" were of like kind.

No, you oversetimated your OWN intelligence -- if you thought that was
good enough to keep you from being a plagiarist.

[snip]


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this